BCIT

That's So Library!

Exceptional resources, services, spaces, technology and people...

  • Home

Archives for April 2025

PD Report: Association of College and Research Libraries Conference – 2025

April 15, 2025 by Jeff Verbeem 4 Comments

Minneapolis, MN

Opening the Association of College and Research Library’s 2025 conference, Ruha Benjamin’s keynote hinged on two propositions: 

 

1. It is the Paypal Mafia, that exclusive billionaire class that touts its Generative AI wares as the solutions for all of society’s problems, that is also the most determined in attacking Higher Education and particularly its activities aroundEDI, Critical Race Theory, and so on.  

2. Having thus confirmed its danger to the powers that be, we (educators, librarians) should be all the more determined to embrace the power of a liberalizing education.  

Her thoughts set the tone for this conference, which can best be described as ’embattled but determined’ – to resist collectively as US Higher Ed comes under increasing attack. A good third (my guess) of the scheduled presentations touched on the topics of GenAI, RDI/EDI or academic freedom. Not everyone was on the same page, particularly around GenAI. It was interesting to see, for example, lightning talk presenters share a stage for directly opposing views. That said, the discussions that I saw were conducted with respect and civility.  (Even US immigration didn’t give me a hard time.) 

Here are a few more highlights: 

  • Academic Freedom Under Threat Academic Librarians from Texas and Florida shared horror stories of how state laws are making it difficult or impossible for them to participate in campus activities like Banned Book Week, Pride Week or to purchase certain kinds of materials. A glimmer of hope (but from California) that union activism, and naming and shaming, can have positive outcomes for librarians with precarious academic freedom. 
  • GenAI Competencies Representatives from the American Library Association presented their draft document AI Competencies for Academic Library Workers. Listening to the feedback their draft generated, between the two extreme positions (all GenAI all the time vs. Luddites), the middle road is to at least know about these technologies and how they work so we can advise faculty and students how to properly use them. (But doesn’t even that low bar require experience using them?) 
  • Resource Evaluation Why & How Librarians and COMM instructors from Eastern Washington University presented results from their collaboration on teaching students about resource evaluation using the WHY Method: 
    • Who wrote it? 
    • How was it edited?
    • Why was this published 

 I do love a good resource eval method, but this one seems too narrowly focused on authority. There are many other factors that encompass quality. But the project was an example of the sort of synergy the library tries to achieve with our COMM classes at BCIT. 

  • Separating the Toys from the Tools Discussion here centred on the Choice Reviews framework for assessing GenAI tools. But new tools with specialized applications are coming out every day, and more are being integrated into our library databases by vendors with little to no consultation (other than a breathlessly enthusiastic announcement after the fact). Librarians reported being asked to vet these tools and give recommendations to faculty. It seems like reinforcing best practices rather than acting as GenAI gatekeepers is a more sustainable role. 
  • Measuring What Matters I sort of knew that there are no easy answers for measuring library impact, but I was still disappointed to hear that there are no easy answers! The Library’s magic sauce is connecting people. Ideally we would have evidence that an investment of x dollars will result in y impact on learning / retention / completion. But libraries all seem to maintain library gate counts that tell us very little of value. This presentation was a good reminder that I need to look at Oakleaf’s work again, which is still considered foundational. (The discussion also reminded me of Henry Minzburg’s recent blogpost on efficiency in a very different context but the point is the same: costs are easy to quantify while benefits are not.)  
  • Partnerships Between Libraries and Writing Centers  This presenter surveyed the partnerships and described a continuum of collaboration between none to establishing a one-stop shop where librarians and writing helpers are side-by-side in presenting support. I need to talk to our own Learning Commons Coordinator, Douglas Buchanan, about more opportunities for collaboration along the lines of our upcoming co-presentation for new Nursing students. 
  • Presentation! My main purpose in attending ACRL was to co-present with Leah Guffroy, a student in UBC’s Archival Studies and Library Information Studies. In fall 2024, Leah did a work placement with BCIT library, during which the two of us explored the concept of Trades Librarianship especially as it plays out at BCIT’s Aerospace Campus Library. Our poster was well-received, and we got a lot of responses along the lines of ‘why aren’t more people talking about this?’. We’ll be talking about it some more, including at BCLA 2025!
Poster @ ACRL

Photo credit: Dan Dziamba

ACRL 2025 BCIT poster

Thanks to Leah for all her work on this project, to Elly (Library Marketing) for the lovely poster template, to Mimi and Alistair (MediaWorks) for their help printing and securing the poster for transport, and to BCIT for supporting this professional development trip. I am very grateful.

Jeff Verbeem

Filed Under: Community, Diversity and Inclusion, Ed Tech Tools & Tips, Professional Development

Archives

  • April 2025
  • March 2025
  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • November 2024
  • September 2024
  • June 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • November 2023
  • September 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • January 2013

Copyright © 2025 · BCIT · BCIT Commons