Fast food difference in contrasting places

Posted on by

Fast food is readily available to all of us. In grocery stores, franchises and even our homes. It’s got a hold of our society for better or worse. There are benefits and disadvantages of fast-food consumption and it all depends on the situation. When you’ve skipped breakfast and have no time to waste, you might want to resort to eating food from a fast-food restaurant. When you’re tired and can’t be bothered to do the dishes and cook a meal, you think of ordering from a fast-food spot. There are other scenarios where fast food might seem like the best option at the time and we don’t think twice about it.

Fast food restaurants have delicious options that are too tempting to resist. McDonald’s has their McFlurries and chicken nuggets, KFC has their fried chicken and burgers, and Subway has their sandwiches. Some options might be healthier than others, but they have a unique menu that appeals to people of the community. Fast food restaurants design their menus to satisfy the preference of the people that live around specific branches. For example, McDonalds has different menus for their customers in Canada and India. There are different demands from these locations and McDonalds capitalizes on this.

The vegetarian options that you can find in a McDonalds in Canada is limited compared to the options provided in India. Fast food corporations are clever in their marketing and food because they notice a chance to appeal to the public and they capitalize on these chances. There are healthier options to pick from, but people are drawn to fast food franchises because of their fast service and reasonable prices. Even the flavours in their food are different in other countries. They use local spices and flavours to entice customers to go back for more. Fast food has unhealthy practices that people are willing to overlook because of convenience.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *