Thanks to the Lightning, we have the hardest quote to come out of the NHL this year, and that came from Lightning GM Julien BriseBois as he responded to probes about trading away draft picks:
“Ultimately, the calculation is that trying & failing will yield less regret than failing to try.”
So tough.
The Lightning, ever the aggressive contenders, made a significant splash at the trade deadline, acquiring Yanni Gourde and Oliver Bjorkstrand in a bold move to bolster their forward depth. While the cost was substantial, the Lightning’s intent was clear: maximize their current window of contention.
https://twitter.com/robcutmore/status/1897835538264342736
What the Lightning Gave Up:
- Michael Eyssimont (F)
- 2026 First-Round Pick (top-10 protected)
- 2027 First-Round Pick (top-10 protected)
- 2025 Second-Round Pick (from Toronto)
What the Lightning Acquired:
- Yanni Gourde (F)
- Oliver Bjorkstrand (F)
- Kyle Aucoin (D)
- 2026 Fifth-Round Pick
Yanni Gourde is back with the Tampa Bay Lightning (Jess Starr/The Hockey Writers)
The Verdict:
The Lightning’s primary objective was to add two-way forward depth, and they achieved that with the acquisitions of Gourde and Bjorkstrand. Both players bring proven scoring ability and playoff experience, addressing a clear need for the team.
However, the price was steep. Trading two first-round picks, a second-round pick, and Michael Eyssimont is a significant investment. The justification lies in the Lightning’s desire to capitalize on their current core, which is still performing at an elite level. The logic is understandable: betting on proven talent is preferable to the uncertainty of draft picks, especially when the team’s window of contention is finite.
Gourde’s return is a sentimental one, and his familiarity with the team should ease his integration. Bjorkstrand provides consistent scoring and will be under contract for another playoff run, adding value beyond this season. The salary retention by the Kraken and Red Wings is a shrewd move by GM Julien BriseBois, mitigating the team’s perennial cap constraints. Throughout the process, BriseBois
The addition of Kyle Aucoin, while seemingly a minor detail, aligns with the Lightning’s history of finding value in overlooked players. While his future is uncertain, it’s a low-risk, potentially high-reward addition.
The #GoBolts and #TimeToHunt GMs never complain about salary cap constraints. They don't worry about how difficult it seems to be to make trades in the NHL. They just make them, says @Ken_Campbell27: https://t.co/C5O316N6iz
— The Hockey News (@TheHockeyNews) March 6, 2025
The analysis correctly points out the bias that can be caused by the previous Jeannot trade. Any move that is not as costly as that one, will seem like a win. Also the fact that Gourde and Bjorkstrand have already played a game and contributed to a win, adds to the positive feeling of this trade.
While the Lightning addressed their needs, the long-term cost is a concern. The loss of multiple high draft picks could impact the team’s future. However, for a team focused on winning now, the gamble is justifiable.
Ultimately, the Lightning’s deadline was a bold move that reflects their commitment to contending. The acquisitions of Gourde and Bjorkstrand significantly improve their forward depth, and the team’s ability to navigate the cap constraints is commendable.
Final Grade: B+ – The Lightning made a significant investment in their present, acquiring valuable forward depth. While the long-term cost is a factor, the immediate impact and strategic maneuvering justify a strong grade.